Ab,surd

A colleague recently shared a review of his (rejected) proposal. The most negative review contained this statement:

There were a number of editorial errors found throughout the proposal. Some were missing commas and the like,

The mind, like, boggles.

Now I need to know: have you ever

• commented on punctuation in a review? (minor errors, egregious errors, pet peeves?) -- did it affect your overall rating of the proposal, as far as you know?

• received a comment on punctuation in a review? (minor errors, egregious errors, pet peeves?)

And if there were punctuation, grammar, and/or spelling errors in a review that criticized you for real or perceived punctuation errors, how did you feel about that?

Did you think, "Oh well, the reviewer is just bashing out a review on a webform and of course shouldn't be held to their own high standards for punctuation in proposals. Perhaps that missing comma on page 10 of the proposal indicates that I am a sloppy and untransformative scientist and therefore didn't deserve a grant that would have supported student research."

Or did you think something a bit more negative about the reviewer's punctuated hypocrisy?